Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
P.B. Isn't Getting M.A.D.
Some residents of Pacific Beach don't want to pay to get a MAD — Maintenance Assessment District — because they feel the property owners shouldn't have to pay to clean up after the bars and their pickled patrons.
On June 10th, at San Diego's City Council meeting, Councilmember Kevin Faulconer pulled the West Pacific Beach MAD proposal from the agenda, at the request of the business improvement association and due to a flood of complaints from coastal constituents about having to pay extra for the formation of a MAD.
The proposal would have asked property and business owners of Pacific Beach to shell out extra money when they pay property taxes. The money would have been collected by the city and later allocated to the newly formed MAD, which would have been responsible for doling out the money for community services.
Nearly $475,000 dollars would have been generated by the assessment levied on Pacific Beach residents. That money would have gone to hiring four more police officers during busy bar hours, graffiti and litter removal, landscape maintenance and upkeep of trees and public trash areas.
Over the past 18 months, Discover Pacific Beach, the local business improvement association, has lobbied to get a MAD in their community.
The executive director for Discover Pacific Beach is Benjamin Nicholls. He is well aware of the rigors that go along with a MAD. He sits on the MAD for Greater Golden Hill and serves as a board member for the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Committee (CDC). Nicholls has witnessed the back and forth, incestuous tug-of-war-struggle between Greater Golden Hill's CDC and their MAD oversight committee. So, is Nicholls a glutton for punishment or just really into getting MAD? He says the two cases aren't exactly comparable.
"There is a lot of activity in the residential areas of Pacific Beach like from house parties, though I do agree that the bars do generate a lot of activity and a lot of trash, but state law says that you can only apply services in the area where the taxes are being levied. Even if the bars created all the trash and those bars were taxed, you couldn't spend any of the money outside of that area."
It was for that reason that Nicholls and Discover PB decided to exclude some residential areas of Pacific Beach from the MAD assessment. But still he says that many in the community weren't in favor of the proposal. "We received the message from a lot of residential folks that they weren't happy with that model, and that's fine. If they don't want to be included than they won't be included."
So now Nicholls and the businesses he represents will keep trying to get the residents of Pacific Beach on board, but he says there is no timeline and does not want to appear as if the MAD was forced on anyone. "We will just have to find another way to do it, with the community."
Visit the Pacific Beach Business Improvement Association at pacificbeach.org. More information is available at community blog, enjoypb.com.
Here's something you might be interested in.
P.B. Isn't Getting M.A.D.
P.B. Isn't Getting M.A.D.
Some residents of Pacific Beach don't want to pay to get a MAD — Maintenance Assessment District — because they feel the property owners shouldn't have to pay to clean up after the bars and their pickled patrons.
On June 10th, at San Diego's City Council meeting, Councilmember Kevin Faulconer pulled the West Pacific Beach MAD proposal from the agenda, at the request of the business improvement association and due to a flood of complaints from coastal constituents about having to pay extra for the formation of a MAD.
The proposal would have asked property and business owners of Pacific Beach to shell out extra money when they pay property taxes. The money would have been collected by the city and later allocated to the newly formed MAD, which would have been responsible for doling out the money for community services.
Nearly $475,000 dollars would have been generated by the assessment levied on Pacific Beach residents. That money would have gone to hiring four more police officers during busy bar hours, graffiti and litter removal, landscape maintenance and upkeep of trees and public trash areas.
Over the past 18 months, Discover Pacific Beach, the local business improvement association, has lobbied to get a MAD in their community.
The executive director for Discover Pacific Beach is Benjamin Nicholls. He is well aware of the rigors that go along with a MAD. He sits on the MAD for Greater Golden Hill and serves as a board member for the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Committee (CDC). Nicholls has witnessed the back and forth, incestuous tug-of-war-struggle between Greater Golden Hill's CDC and their MAD oversight committee. So, is Nicholls a glutton for punishment or just really into getting MAD? He says the two cases aren't exactly comparable.
"There is a lot of activity in the residential areas of Pacific Beach like from house parties, though I do agree that the bars do generate a lot of activity and a lot of trash, but state law says that you can only apply services in the area where the taxes are being levied. Even if the bars created all the trash and those bars were taxed, you couldn't spend any of the money outside of that area."
It was for that reason that Nicholls and Discover PB decided to exclude some residential areas of Pacific Beach from the MAD assessment. But still he says that many in the community weren't in favor of the proposal. "We received the message from a lot of residential folks that they weren't happy with that model, and that's fine. If they don't want to be included than they won't be included."
So now Nicholls and the businesses he represents will keep trying to get the residents of Pacific Beach on board, but he says there is no timeline and does not want to appear as if the MAD was forced on anyone. "We will just have to find another way to do it, with the community."
Visit the Pacific Beach Business Improvement Association at pacificbeach.org. More information is available at community blog, enjoypb.com.
Comments