Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Scoobie Davis Online
Title: Scoobie Davis Online Address: http://scoobiedavis.blogspot.com Author: Scoobie Davis Blogging from: College Area Blogging since: February 2002 Post Date: October 31, 2006 Post Title: The Jack T. Chick Documentary
[Editor's note: Jack Chick publishes tracts that promote Christianity while attacking its perceived enemies: Catholicism, Freemasonry, evolution, etc.] For the past two years, I have been chomping at the bit in my desire to tell you this: I am the first person to do a recorded interview of Jack Chick in over 30 years. Those of you familiar with this blog know that I have a great interest in Jack Chick's work (which has attained icon status, at least in terms of popular culture). That interest will be manifested in a documentary film.
I first met Jack Chick at one of the premieres for his film The Light of the World in October 2003. When I arrived at the church in Orange County where the premiere was held, I eagerly anticipated watching the film and possibly seeing Chick (though I wasn't counting on seeing him, because of his reputation for avoiding the limelight).
Even though I disagreed with the theology of the film (clips are available on YouTube), I was very impressed with the quality of the paintings for the film (most of which were done by Chick Publications' artist Fred Carter).
After the screening, to my surprise, Chick and Carter were introduced to the crowd of several hundred (we gave them a standing ovation). After the introductions, people congratulated Chick and Carter. I shook hands with Chick and told him I was a big fan of his work; I also complimented Fred Carter on the painstaking process of doing most of the 360 paintings used in the film.
I had given thought to a documentary film on Chick for quite some time. One big hurdle was that he hadn't given an interview since 1975. However, there were two things on my side:
(1) I knew that Chick invested heavily in his film and would probably welcome any help with promoting it.
(2) I'm rather resourceful in terms of getting into places I shouldn't be, and being in the interviewer's chair with Jack Chick was just another challenge.
I started off by calling the head of the Light of the World Foundation, posing as a fundamentalist filmmaker, and offering to give advice on promoting the film. He agreed, so I cut my long hair and put on conservative clothes before I met with him at his office. I gave him some valuable advice based on my own experience in independent filmmaking (for instance, I told him to get the film listed on the Internet Movie Database). One of the other ideas was a documentary film that could possibly be played on public access television. The head of the foundation contacted Chick; a few days later, the head of the foundation told me that Chick prayed about whether to give me an interview for my documentary. Apparently, God gave Chick the green light because, to my surprise, he agreed to an interview (artist Fred Carter also agreed to an interview).
Before I go any further, let me discuss the ethical implications of my actions. There are no hard-and-fast ethical guidelines for documentary filmmakers. At various film festivals and film seminars, I have spoken to documentary filmmakers who have told me that the most important thing is to get the interview.
That wasn't good enough for me. While journalists are not documentarians, the two groups have much in common. I looked at the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists for guidance. The code states, "Journalists should avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story." I think going undercover was the only way for me to get the interview. Had I told Chick the truth about who I was, my chances of getting an interview would have been nil.
The Code also dictates, "Journalists should recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone's privacy." On the one hand, I respect Chick's desire for privacy, and I would do nothing to invade his privacy. However, Jack Chick is the world's most published living author. (Years ago, it was estimated that he has sold 500,000,000 tracts and books. Chick told me that he sells over 130,000 tracts a day so my guess is that the current total is closer to 750,000,000 books and tracts distributed.) Chick and his ideas deserve examination--not debunking, mind you, because Chick tracts generally deal with matters of faith. Nevertheless, the Chick tract phenomenon should be looked at from a sociohistorical and a cultural perspective.
One overarching principle of the Code is that "ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect." Although I disagree with Chick from a theological standpoint, I have no doubt in his sincerity and respect him for taking unpopular views--views that almost cost him his business. I also like Chick as a person and was pleased with his down-to-earth and unaffected manner (e.g., he insisted that I call him Jack). Although Chick has been accused of creating hate literature, I can attest that Jack Chick, in his heart, is not a hater.
I met Chick and Fred Carter for their interviews at Fred Carter's house. Both men had interesting insights. I won't go any further on this. Wait for the film!
Here's something you might be interested in.
Scoobie Davis Online
Scoobie Davis Online
Title: Scoobie Davis Online Address: http://scoobiedavis.blogspot.com Author: Scoobie Davis Blogging from: College Area Blogging since: February 2002 Post Date: October 31, 2006 Post Title: The Jack T. Chick Documentary
[Editor's note: Jack Chick publishes tracts that promote Christianity while attacking its perceived enemies: Catholicism, Freemasonry, evolution, etc.] For the past two years, I have been chomping at the bit in my desire to tell you this: I am the first person to do a recorded interview of Jack Chick in over 30 years. Those of you familiar with this blog know that I have a great interest in Jack Chick's work (which has attained icon status, at least in terms of popular culture). That interest will be manifested in a documentary film.
I first met Jack Chick at one of the premieres for his film The Light of the World in October 2003. When I arrived at the church in Orange County where the premiere was held, I eagerly anticipated watching the film and possibly seeing Chick (though I wasn't counting on seeing him, because of his reputation for avoiding the limelight).
Even though I disagreed with the theology of the film (clips are available on YouTube), I was very impressed with the quality of the paintings for the film (most of which were done by Chick Publications' artist Fred Carter).
After the screening, to my surprise, Chick and Carter were introduced to the crowd of several hundred (we gave them a standing ovation). After the introductions, people congratulated Chick and Carter. I shook hands with Chick and told him I was a big fan of his work; I also complimented Fred Carter on the painstaking process of doing most of the 360 paintings used in the film.
I had given thought to a documentary film on Chick for quite some time. One big hurdle was that he hadn't given an interview since 1975. However, there were two things on my side:
(1) I knew that Chick invested heavily in his film and would probably welcome any help with promoting it.
(2) I'm rather resourceful in terms of getting into places I shouldn't be, and being in the interviewer's chair with Jack Chick was just another challenge.
I started off by calling the head of the Light of the World Foundation, posing as a fundamentalist filmmaker, and offering to give advice on promoting the film. He agreed, so I cut my long hair and put on conservative clothes before I met with him at his office. I gave him some valuable advice based on my own experience in independent filmmaking (for instance, I told him to get the film listed on the Internet Movie Database). One of the other ideas was a documentary film that could possibly be played on public access television. The head of the foundation contacted Chick; a few days later, the head of the foundation told me that Chick prayed about whether to give me an interview for my documentary. Apparently, God gave Chick the green light because, to my surprise, he agreed to an interview (artist Fred Carter also agreed to an interview).
Before I go any further, let me discuss the ethical implications of my actions. There are no hard-and-fast ethical guidelines for documentary filmmakers. At various film festivals and film seminars, I have spoken to documentary filmmakers who have told me that the most important thing is to get the interview.
That wasn't good enough for me. While journalists are not documentarians, the two groups have much in common. I looked at the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists for guidance. The code states, "Journalists should avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story." I think going undercover was the only way for me to get the interview. Had I told Chick the truth about who I was, my chances of getting an interview would have been nil.
The Code also dictates, "Journalists should recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone's privacy." On the one hand, I respect Chick's desire for privacy, and I would do nothing to invade his privacy. However, Jack Chick is the world's most published living author. (Years ago, it was estimated that he has sold 500,000,000 tracts and books. Chick told me that he sells over 130,000 tracts a day so my guess is that the current total is closer to 750,000,000 books and tracts distributed.) Chick and his ideas deserve examination--not debunking, mind you, because Chick tracts generally deal with matters of faith. Nevertheless, the Chick tract phenomenon should be looked at from a sociohistorical and a cultural perspective.
One overarching principle of the Code is that "ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect." Although I disagree with Chick from a theological standpoint, I have no doubt in his sincerity and respect him for taking unpopular views--views that almost cost him his business. I also like Chick as a person and was pleased with his down-to-earth and unaffected manner (e.g., he insisted that I call him Jack). Although Chick has been accused of creating hate literature, I can attest that Jack Chick, in his heart, is not a hater.
I met Chick and Fred Carter for their interviews at Fred Carter's house. Both men had interesting insights. I won't go any further on this. Wait for the film!
Comments