Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Public figure number one
Dear Matthew Alice:
Every time I watch the show Cops, I wonder why the arrestees would consent to being on TV. There is a disclaimer at the beginning that says, "All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law," but that can't possibly make it legal to exploit people this way, can it? If not, why would they consent? And why don't the "suspects" question the fact that they are being filmed during their arrest?
-- Nancy in Carlsbad
Don�t do the crime if you can't handle the publicity. Rule number one in the felon's guide to life. If the authorities catch you crawling into somebody's house through the dog door or carrying out jewelry and appliances in a bed sheet, you've got a lot of 'splainin' to do. And it's all public record. You, law-abiding citizen Nancy, might have an expectation of privacy in, say, your own bedroom; anybody who ambushes you there with a camera couldn't air the tapes without your permission. A criminal certainly hopes he'll have privacy when he's rifling through your dresser drawers; but if the cops bust in on him with camera and sound crews, privacy laws won't protect him. No signed release needed because as a suspect in a crime, he's now a public figure.
A trickier question was recently answered by the California Supreme Court. Say that back in your misguided young adulthood you committed a crime, and it was documented by one of the dozens of true-crime TV shows-- Cops, Forensic Files, City Confidential, American Justice, The Prosecutors, The Investigators, Psychic Detectives, Body of Evidence, True Stories of the FBI�. So you do your time and turn your life around. Now you're a solid citizen. But TV loves a rerun (film it once, air it a thousand times, make big profits), and 15 years later you still see your felonious face on the tube, all the ugly details of your crime spelled out as if it had been committed last week. Will the courts help you stop the network from airing the show and ruining your new, improved reputation? Unfortunately, no. Public record is public record forever and ever.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Public figure number one
Public figure number one
Dear Matthew Alice:
Every time I watch the show Cops, I wonder why the arrestees would consent to being on TV. There is a disclaimer at the beginning that says, "All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law," but that can't possibly make it legal to exploit people this way, can it? If not, why would they consent? And why don't the "suspects" question the fact that they are being filmed during their arrest?
-- Nancy in Carlsbad
Don�t do the crime if you can't handle the publicity. Rule number one in the felon's guide to life. If the authorities catch you crawling into somebody's house through the dog door or carrying out jewelry and appliances in a bed sheet, you've got a lot of 'splainin' to do. And it's all public record. You, law-abiding citizen Nancy, might have an expectation of privacy in, say, your own bedroom; anybody who ambushes you there with a camera couldn't air the tapes without your permission. A criminal certainly hopes he'll have privacy when he's rifling through your dresser drawers; but if the cops bust in on him with camera and sound crews, privacy laws won't protect him. No signed release needed because as a suspect in a crime, he's now a public figure.
A trickier question was recently answered by the California Supreme Court. Say that back in your misguided young adulthood you committed a crime, and it was documented by one of the dozens of true-crime TV shows-- Cops, Forensic Files, City Confidential, American Justice, The Prosecutors, The Investigators, Psychic Detectives, Body of Evidence, True Stories of the FBI�. So you do your time and turn your life around. Now you're a solid citizen. But TV loves a rerun (film it once, air it a thousand times, make big profits), and 15 years later you still see your felonious face on the tube, all the ugly details of your crime spelled out as if it had been committed last week. Will the courts help you stop the network from airing the show and ruining your new, improved reputation? Unfortunately, no. Public record is public record forever and ever.
Comments