Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Tiny, tiny type
Heymatt:
Are there any laws about how small "fine print" can be in a contract?
Broadly speaing, where there is a legal mandate that a document, label, warning notice, etc. be legible, the standard is simply that the information be "clear and conspicuous." The wording is taken directly from the Federal Trade Commission's 1975 Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. An FTC spokesman says some provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and some industrial trade regulations are more specific As a general guideline, the FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible. For comparison's sake, I'll tell you that Matt Alice is brought to you each week in 7.5- or 8-point type; most newspaper classifieds are 6-point.
But "clear and conspicuous" is also a function of typestyle, ink and paper colors, line length, spacing between lines, and other factors, which aren't addressed in the law. And while the FTC has jurisdiction in interstate commerce and most banking and credit-related documents, "C and C" has many guardians. The FDA is responsible for overseeing the laughable fly specks they call "labeling" on over-the-counter medications; the Treasury Department polices booze bottles; and the states themselves oversee another whole set of consumer information. And how about those lines of bitty type that wing past you on a TV screen, most notably in car-lease commercials? The info is required by law to be in the commercial and is subject to the old C and C standards. The FTC recommends that 5 seconds out of each 30-second commercial be devoted to full consumer warnings if the commercial contains one of a list of "trigger" terms (e.g., "monthly payments"). In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words�. Lawsuits have helped clarify exactly what constitutes "clear and conspicuous" for specific documents, products, etc., but you'd have to track those case by case. It's all pretty much a mice-type nightmare.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Tiny, tiny type
Tiny, tiny type
Heymatt:
Are there any laws about how small "fine print" can be in a contract?
Broadly speaing, where there is a legal mandate that a document, label, warning notice, etc. be legible, the standard is simply that the information be "clear and conspicuous." The wording is taken directly from the Federal Trade Commission's 1975 Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. An FTC spokesman says some provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and some industrial trade regulations are more specific As a general guideline, the FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible. For comparison's sake, I'll tell you that Matt Alice is brought to you each week in 7.5- or 8-point type; most newspaper classifieds are 6-point.
But "clear and conspicuous" is also a function of typestyle, ink and paper colors, line length, spacing between lines, and other factors, which aren't addressed in the law. And while the FTC has jurisdiction in interstate commerce and most banking and credit-related documents, "C and C" has many guardians. The FDA is responsible for overseeing the laughable fly specks they call "labeling" on over-the-counter medications; the Treasury Department polices booze bottles; and the states themselves oversee another whole set of consumer information. And how about those lines of bitty type that wing past you on a TV screen, most notably in car-lease commercials? The info is required by law to be in the commercial and is subject to the old C and C standards. The FTC recommends that 5 seconds out of each 30-second commercial be devoted to full consumer warnings if the commercial contains one of a list of "trigger" terms (e.g., "monthly payments"). In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words�. Lawsuits have helped clarify exactly what constitutes "clear and conspicuous" for specific documents, products, etc., but you'd have to track those case by case. It's all pretty much a mice-type nightmare.
Comments