Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Many, many nose problems.
Dear Matt:
I read somewhere that a good piece of fruit smells like it should. A peach should smell peachy, for example. The other day I was browsing the produce aisles in Henry's, sniffing the peaches and plums before I bag them so I don't get any duds, and an old lady scolded me publicly for putting my nose near the fruit. Am I getting germs on the fruit by smelling them? Isn't the fruit already pretty germy from people touching it?
-- Buffy, the net
Hey:
So I'm outside, shuffled off with the rejects, smoking a cigarette, and some lady comes screeching around the corner saying something about how she's going to die from my smoke because she's "allergic" to it. I told her it's not possible to be allergic to smoke. She didn't like that at all. I didn't care. But I thought I'd better check and make sure I'm right before I use that line again. You can be allergic to dogs and roses, but can a person really be allergic to cigarette smoke?
-- Puff the Dragon, hanging out
Matt:
When we smell something, do we actually suck tiny pieces of that thing into our noses?
-- Just Curious, San Diego
Whew! Edgy, edgy times. Fistfights in the produce aisles. Nose rage? Don't know what was biting the old babe, but of course your nose does not radiate germs. And of course even the best-washed hands are questionable. But you probably had your nose very, very close to the fruit, since produce is kept chilled, and cold air prevents all the nifty volatile oils in the fruit from vaporizing into something actually smellable. That's the big hitch in the smell-the-produce theory. It's hard to smell a peach in the average store. A smell is a gaseous form of certain chemicals in the dog poop or roses or whatever. Substances are more or less stable, chemically, which means a rock won't stink but coconut suntan oil will. So yes, if you stretch a point, when you take a whiff of that mmm-mmm-good new-car smell, you're inhaling vaporized dashboard, upholstery, and headliner. If you stretch a point. And as for that cigarette allergy, Puff's right, smoke isn't an allergen in the strict medical sense. For a substance to trigger an allergic reaction, you need a protein component that tobacco smoke doesn't have. What the screeching lady should have said is that the mucous membranes in her nasal passages are sensitive to assault by tobacco smoke; or maybe she should have said she is asthmatic and cigarette smoke makes it worse. But if you want to get picky, picky, picky, no, she should not be saying she's allergic to cigarette smoke. But I also predict you're cruisin' for a bruisin' if you continue to challenge the smoke-enraged in this way. Would you rather be right or keep all your original teeth?
Here's something you might be interested in.
Many, many nose problems.
Many, many nose problems.
Dear Matt:
I read somewhere that a good piece of fruit smells like it should. A peach should smell peachy, for example. The other day I was browsing the produce aisles in Henry's, sniffing the peaches and plums before I bag them so I don't get any duds, and an old lady scolded me publicly for putting my nose near the fruit. Am I getting germs on the fruit by smelling them? Isn't the fruit already pretty germy from people touching it?
-- Buffy, the net
Hey:
So I'm outside, shuffled off with the rejects, smoking a cigarette, and some lady comes screeching around the corner saying something about how she's going to die from my smoke because she's "allergic" to it. I told her it's not possible to be allergic to smoke. She didn't like that at all. I didn't care. But I thought I'd better check and make sure I'm right before I use that line again. You can be allergic to dogs and roses, but can a person really be allergic to cigarette smoke?
-- Puff the Dragon, hanging out
Matt:
When we smell something, do we actually suck tiny pieces of that thing into our noses?
-- Just Curious, San Diego
Whew! Edgy, edgy times. Fistfights in the produce aisles. Nose rage? Don't know what was biting the old babe, but of course your nose does not radiate germs. And of course even the best-washed hands are questionable. But you probably had your nose very, very close to the fruit, since produce is kept chilled, and cold air prevents all the nifty volatile oils in the fruit from vaporizing into something actually smellable. That's the big hitch in the smell-the-produce theory. It's hard to smell a peach in the average store. A smell is a gaseous form of certain chemicals in the dog poop or roses or whatever. Substances are more or less stable, chemically, which means a rock won't stink but coconut suntan oil will. So yes, if you stretch a point, when you take a whiff of that mmm-mmm-good new-car smell, you're inhaling vaporized dashboard, upholstery, and headliner. If you stretch a point. And as for that cigarette allergy, Puff's right, smoke isn't an allergen in the strict medical sense. For a substance to trigger an allergic reaction, you need a protein component that tobacco smoke doesn't have. What the screeching lady should have said is that the mucous membranes in her nasal passages are sensitive to assault by tobacco smoke; or maybe she should have said she is asthmatic and cigarette smoke makes it worse. But if you want to get picky, picky, picky, no, she should not be saying she's allergic to cigarette smoke. But I also predict you're cruisin' for a bruisin' if you continue to challenge the smoke-enraged in this way. Would you rather be right or keep all your original teeth?
Comments