Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
The smallest fine print can be
The FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible
In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words.
Dear Matthew Alice: Is there a legal minimum that the fine print in documents, etc., must be? — Mimi Labrucherie, USD
Mr. Master of Great Wisdom & Knowledge: You’re always told to read the “fine print” on any contract before signing it, right? Well, if it’s called ‘ fine print, ” how come I can’t read it unless I use a telescope? — A Guy, San Diego
Well, there’s your problem, Guy. Try a microscope. Mimi’s answer’s not so simple. Broadly speaking, where there is a legal mandate that a document, label, warning notice, etc. be legible, the standard is simply that the information be “clear and conspicuous,” wording taken directly from the Federal Trade Commission’s 1975 Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. An FTC spokesman says some provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and some industrial trade regulations are more specific. As a general guideline, the FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible. (For comparison, I’m told that M.A. is brought to you each week at 7.5 or 8 points, and most newspapers’ classified ads are 6 point.) But C&C is also a function of typestyle, ink and paper colors, line length, spacing between lines, and other factors which aren’t addressed. And while the FTC has jurisdiction in interstate commerce, most banking and credit-related documents, etc., the FDA is responsible for overseeing the laughable fly specks they call “labeling” on medications, the Treasury Department polices booze bottles, and the states themselves oversee another whole set of consumer information. C&C has many guardians. And how about those lines of bitty type that wing past you on the TV screen (“mice type,” the ad guys call it), most notably in car lease commercials. The info is required by law and is subject to the C&C standards. The FTC recommends that 5 seconds out of each 30-second commercial be devoted to full consumer warnings if the commercial contains one of a list of “trigger” terms (e.g., “monthly payments”). In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words. Ever see a car lease agreement that summed it all up in 20 words? Lawsuits have helped clarify exactly what constitutes “clear and conspicuous” for certain specific products/documents/etc., but you’d have to track those case by case. All in all, C&C is a mice-type nightmare.
Here's something you might be interested in.
The smallest fine print can be
The FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible
The smallest fine print can be
The FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible
In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words.
Dear Matthew Alice: Is there a legal minimum that the fine print in documents, etc., must be? — Mimi Labrucherie, USD
Mr. Master of Great Wisdom & Knowledge: You’re always told to read the “fine print” on any contract before signing it, right? Well, if it’s called ‘ fine print, ” how come I can’t read it unless I use a telescope? — A Guy, San Diego
Well, there’s your problem, Guy. Try a microscope. Mimi’s answer’s not so simple. Broadly speaking, where there is a legal mandate that a document, label, warning notice, etc. be legible, the standard is simply that the information be “clear and conspicuous,” wording taken directly from the Federal Trade Commission’s 1975 Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act. An FTC spokesman says some provisions of the Truth in Lending Act and some industrial trade regulations are more specific. As a general guideline, the FTC considers 8-point type the minimum legible. (For comparison, I’m told that M.A. is brought to you each week at 7.5 or 8 points, and most newspapers’ classified ads are 6 point.) But C&C is also a function of typestyle, ink and paper colors, line length, spacing between lines, and other factors which aren’t addressed. And while the FTC has jurisdiction in interstate commerce, most banking and credit-related documents, etc., the FDA is responsible for overseeing the laughable fly specks they call “labeling” on medications, the Treasury Department polices booze bottles, and the states themselves oversee another whole set of consumer information. C&C has many guardians. And how about those lines of bitty type that wing past you on the TV screen (“mice type,” the ad guys call it), most notably in car lease commercials. The info is required by law and is subject to the C&C standards. The FTC recommends that 5 seconds out of each 30-second commercial be devoted to full consumer warnings if the commercial contains one of a list of “trigger” terms (e.g., “monthly payments”). In five seconds, the average person can read 20 words. Ever see a car lease agreement that summed it all up in 20 words? Lawsuits have helped clarify exactly what constitutes “clear and conspicuous” for certain specific products/documents/etc., but you’d have to track those case by case. All in all, C&C is a mice-type nightmare.
Comments