Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Origin of the f-word
Not even Chaucer or Shakespeare use it
Dear Mr. Alice: I’ve always wondered about that most vulgar of English vulgarities, the F-word. I remember my fifth-grade teacher claimed it stood for Fornication Under Consent of the King. What is its true semantic history? — Tony Testa, La Jolla
And just what was the discussion topic the day your teacher had occasion to tell a bunch of ten-year-olds that little story? A particularly spicy show-and-tell session? Well, I’m happy to see that even at that tender age, you knew a crock when you heard one, Tony. “Origin unknown,” states the Oxford English Dictionary. Its first print reference dates from 1503, from northern England or Scotland, which means it was likely in the spoken language as much as a century before that. It’s always been a hypernaughty term (not even Chaucer or Shakespeare use it), which would keep it out of print much longer than most new words.
Lots of our yeasty English expletives were originally Anglo-Saxon, but this one probably isn’t. However we got ahold of it, it seems to be related to a whole series of old Indo-European words originally meaning “to prick,” “to strike,” or “to push” — Swedish fockar, Norse fukkar, German ficken, and so on.
The story about the obliging king may date from the mid-1700s, when the British crown began making laws concerning the age of marriage and consent. Another popular and erroneous story says the word comes from a notation on British police blotters next to the names of people arrested for sex crimes (and later appropriated by Van Halen): For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge. Undoubtedly it was just a short, sharp, handy word that seemed to sum up our feelings neatly from time to time, even back in the Middle Ages, and we’ve hung on to it ever since.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Origin of the f-word
Not even Chaucer or Shakespeare use it
Origin of the f-word
Not even Chaucer or Shakespeare use it
Dear Mr. Alice: I’ve always wondered about that most vulgar of English vulgarities, the F-word. I remember my fifth-grade teacher claimed it stood for Fornication Under Consent of the King. What is its true semantic history? — Tony Testa, La Jolla
And just what was the discussion topic the day your teacher had occasion to tell a bunch of ten-year-olds that little story? A particularly spicy show-and-tell session? Well, I’m happy to see that even at that tender age, you knew a crock when you heard one, Tony. “Origin unknown,” states the Oxford English Dictionary. Its first print reference dates from 1503, from northern England or Scotland, which means it was likely in the spoken language as much as a century before that. It’s always been a hypernaughty term (not even Chaucer or Shakespeare use it), which would keep it out of print much longer than most new words.
Lots of our yeasty English expletives were originally Anglo-Saxon, but this one probably isn’t. However we got ahold of it, it seems to be related to a whole series of old Indo-European words originally meaning “to prick,” “to strike,” or “to push” — Swedish fockar, Norse fukkar, German ficken, and so on.
The story about the obliging king may date from the mid-1700s, when the British crown began making laws concerning the age of marriage and consent. Another popular and erroneous story says the word comes from a notation on British police blotters next to the names of people arrested for sex crimes (and later appropriated by Van Halen): For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge. Undoubtedly it was just a short, sharp, handy word that seemed to sum up our feelings neatly from time to time, even back in the Middle Ages, and we’ve hung on to it ever since.
Comments