Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Explosives planted in the Coronado bridge
How ships will escape from the bay in case of sabotage
Special units of the Navy are trained to clear bridge debris in case of a collapse.
Dear Matthew Alice: When I was serving a sentence in the Navy in the ’70s, there was a salty rumor floating around that I accepted as gospel. First: The Coronado bridge is designed to float in case of a collapse so that the tugboats could easily unblock the channel leading out of the 32nd St. Naval Station. Second: The Strand is designed so explosive devices could be planted to blow away any sections of the roadway so that ships could escape directly to sea, therefore avoiding the floating bridge. What’s up, M.A.? — Rick in O.B.
Dear Matthew Alice: A friend of mine told me that the Coronado bridge and the Silver Strand are lined with explosives so that in case of war they can be blown up and the Navy ships can get out faster. Is this true? If so, is there any chance that we may accidentally be blown to bits while driving on the bridge? — Nicole Pfeiffer, Chula Vista
Personally, I’d be more concerned about bands of disgruntled Coronadans (Coronodoites? Coronodders?) sniping us off the span like tin cans off a fence. Most of the town has been unhappy about the bridge since San Diegans first started discussing it in the mid-1920s.
Even back then, the Navy had real concerns about ships being trapped in the harbor if the bridge were sabotaged. So of course, there’s a contingency plan. Special units of the Navy are trained to clear bridge debris in case of a collapse, and that does include placing explosives in predetermined locations to break up the fallen structure and make it easier to remove. All this was considered during the bridge design, but there’s no dynamite actually built into it.
As for rumors about blowing up the Strand, could they come from the on-again off-again discussions about cutting a channel across it so small boats can get in and out of the harbor faster? This is more a civilian than a.military plan, and for the moment, the Navy is against it. (Consider the size of the explosion required to blow a trench deep enough and wide enough for a carrier to make a quick exit.) So...the bridge won’t float if it falls. It won’t detonate on its own some lazy Sunday afternoon. The Navy won’t blow it up on purpose if it’s not already collapsed. And there are no immediate plans to blast a trench through the Strand. Just keep your eye on those deceptively blase civilians.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Explosives planted in the Coronado bridge
How ships will escape from the bay in case of sabotage
Explosives planted in the Coronado bridge
How ships will escape from the bay in case of sabotage
Special units of the Navy are trained to clear bridge debris in case of a collapse.
Dear Matthew Alice: When I was serving a sentence in the Navy in the ’70s, there was a salty rumor floating around that I accepted as gospel. First: The Coronado bridge is designed to float in case of a collapse so that the tugboats could easily unblock the channel leading out of the 32nd St. Naval Station. Second: The Strand is designed so explosive devices could be planted to blow away any sections of the roadway so that ships could escape directly to sea, therefore avoiding the floating bridge. What’s up, M.A.? — Rick in O.B.
Dear Matthew Alice: A friend of mine told me that the Coronado bridge and the Silver Strand are lined with explosives so that in case of war they can be blown up and the Navy ships can get out faster. Is this true? If so, is there any chance that we may accidentally be blown to bits while driving on the bridge? — Nicole Pfeiffer, Chula Vista
Personally, I’d be more concerned about bands of disgruntled Coronadans (Coronodoites? Coronodders?) sniping us off the span like tin cans off a fence. Most of the town has been unhappy about the bridge since San Diegans first started discussing it in the mid-1920s.
Even back then, the Navy had real concerns about ships being trapped in the harbor if the bridge were sabotaged. So of course, there’s a contingency plan. Special units of the Navy are trained to clear bridge debris in case of a collapse, and that does include placing explosives in predetermined locations to break up the fallen structure and make it easier to remove. All this was considered during the bridge design, but there’s no dynamite actually built into it.
As for rumors about blowing up the Strand, could they come from the on-again off-again discussions about cutting a channel across it so small boats can get in and out of the harbor faster? This is more a civilian than a.military plan, and for the moment, the Navy is against it. (Consider the size of the explosion required to blow a trench deep enough and wide enough for a carrier to make a quick exit.) So...the bridge won’t float if it falls. It won’t detonate on its own some lazy Sunday afternoon. The Navy won’t blow it up on purpose if it’s not already collapsed. And there are no immediate plans to blast a trench through the Strand. Just keep your eye on those deceptively blase civilians.
Comments