Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Animals who suffer morning sickness
Margie Profet's theory of first trimester toxins
A UCSD scientist camped out at the San Diego Zoo looking for signs of queasiness among pregnant apes.
Dear Matthew Alice: The term “morning sickness” seems a misnomer in my wife’s case. During her pregnancy she was in terrible misery 24 hours a day for months, despite her careful efforts in following medical advice. It was like being constantly seasick with no end in sight. Her doctors were unable to tell her what causes such sickness. Do you have an answer? Also, I’ve never heard of animals other than humans suffering like this during pregnancy. Are other animals prone to such problems? — R.A., San Diego
Let me assure you I’m hoarding no secret knowledge on the subject, unwilling to share it with the medical community. The cause of morning sickness is long on speculation, short on scientific proof. Your second question is a lot easier. Just a year ago, a UCSD scientist camped out at the San Diego Zoo looking for signs of queasiness among pregnant great apes, our nearest genetic neighbors. None were seen. And no signs of morning sickness have ever been found in lower animals. Apparently it is an affliction reserved for humans.
Even a decade ago, the medical community suspected morning sickness (like other “female complaints”) was basically an emotional problem — anxiety or subconscious rejection of the pregnancy, perhaps. The fact that 75 percent of pregnant women experience some degree of nausea and vomiting (2 percent require hospitalization) does seem to argue against the idea that “It’s All in Your Head.” Speculation now is that increased estrogen is the culprit. Estrogen heightens the sense of smell, and this hypersensitivity triggers nausea and vomiting. Individual variations in body chemistry account for the degree of severity of the sickness and the diversity of the smell triggers. Scientific studies haven’t confirmed this conclusion, but it’s still offered as a possible explanation. Pregnancy also dramatically slows the digestive process, so this is also being investigated. Alternative theories: thyroid malfunction; deficiencies in zinc, copper, Vitamin B6; or biochemical changes resulting from the struggle for survival between mother and fetus.
This last theory, proposed by some evolutionary biologists, views pregnancy less as a cooperative venture than as subtle Darwinian chemical warfare, in which the fetus protects itself against miscarriage by inducing changes in the mother’s body. These changes perhaps trigger morning sickness, high blood pressure, diabetes-like symptoms, and other maladies in pregnant women.
But the newest evolutionary theory comes from maverick Margie Profet (degrees in political philosophy and physics from Harvard and Berkeley, once employed in a Berkeley biology lab, now “thinking” full-time on a MacArthur fellowship). As Profet explains it, the first trimester, when morning sickness is usually at its worst, is the time the developing embryo is most susceptible to toxins that cause serious birth defects. All body systems and structures are being established in a process of cell differentiation at this time. Morning sickness is the mother’s body sensing and rejecting potentially harmful substances. Profet speculates that the brainstem structure responsible for sampling blood for toxins may be “recalibrated” during the first three months of pregnancy, thus protecting the developing embryo. During the second and third trimesters, when nutritional requirements of the rapidly growing fetus take priority and susceptibility to toxins is lower, mom can pig out. According to Profet, it’s not by chance that bitter, spicy, and pungent foods are most commonly shunned by pregnant women. It’s the natural toxins in these foods that give them their characteristic flavors and smells. Profet is a “philosopher,” not a lab scientist, so it’s left to others to put her theories to the test.
Treatment of morning sickness with medications is risky business. One nontoxic antinausea remedy marketed to boaters and expectant mothers consists of an elastic band with a metal ball that is placed over the P-6 or Neiguan acupressure point near the wrist. Some people say it works.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Animals who suffer morning sickness
Margie Profet's theory of first trimester toxins
Animals who suffer morning sickness
Margie Profet's theory of first trimester toxins
A UCSD scientist camped out at the San Diego Zoo looking for signs of queasiness among pregnant apes.
Dear Matthew Alice: The term “morning sickness” seems a misnomer in my wife’s case. During her pregnancy she was in terrible misery 24 hours a day for months, despite her careful efforts in following medical advice. It was like being constantly seasick with no end in sight. Her doctors were unable to tell her what causes such sickness. Do you have an answer? Also, I’ve never heard of animals other than humans suffering like this during pregnancy. Are other animals prone to such problems? — R.A., San Diego
Let me assure you I’m hoarding no secret knowledge on the subject, unwilling to share it with the medical community. The cause of morning sickness is long on speculation, short on scientific proof. Your second question is a lot easier. Just a year ago, a UCSD scientist camped out at the San Diego Zoo looking for signs of queasiness among pregnant great apes, our nearest genetic neighbors. None were seen. And no signs of morning sickness have ever been found in lower animals. Apparently it is an affliction reserved for humans.
Even a decade ago, the medical community suspected morning sickness (like other “female complaints”) was basically an emotional problem — anxiety or subconscious rejection of the pregnancy, perhaps. The fact that 75 percent of pregnant women experience some degree of nausea and vomiting (2 percent require hospitalization) does seem to argue against the idea that “It’s All in Your Head.” Speculation now is that increased estrogen is the culprit. Estrogen heightens the sense of smell, and this hypersensitivity triggers nausea and vomiting. Individual variations in body chemistry account for the degree of severity of the sickness and the diversity of the smell triggers. Scientific studies haven’t confirmed this conclusion, but it’s still offered as a possible explanation. Pregnancy also dramatically slows the digestive process, so this is also being investigated. Alternative theories: thyroid malfunction; deficiencies in zinc, copper, Vitamin B6; or biochemical changes resulting from the struggle for survival between mother and fetus.
This last theory, proposed by some evolutionary biologists, views pregnancy less as a cooperative venture than as subtle Darwinian chemical warfare, in which the fetus protects itself against miscarriage by inducing changes in the mother’s body. These changes perhaps trigger morning sickness, high blood pressure, diabetes-like symptoms, and other maladies in pregnant women.
But the newest evolutionary theory comes from maverick Margie Profet (degrees in political philosophy and physics from Harvard and Berkeley, once employed in a Berkeley biology lab, now “thinking” full-time on a MacArthur fellowship). As Profet explains it, the first trimester, when morning sickness is usually at its worst, is the time the developing embryo is most susceptible to toxins that cause serious birth defects. All body systems and structures are being established in a process of cell differentiation at this time. Morning sickness is the mother’s body sensing and rejecting potentially harmful substances. Profet speculates that the brainstem structure responsible for sampling blood for toxins may be “recalibrated” during the first three months of pregnancy, thus protecting the developing embryo. During the second and third trimesters, when nutritional requirements of the rapidly growing fetus take priority and susceptibility to toxins is lower, mom can pig out. According to Profet, it’s not by chance that bitter, spicy, and pungent foods are most commonly shunned by pregnant women. It’s the natural toxins in these foods that give them their characteristic flavors and smells. Profet is a “philosopher,” not a lab scientist, so it’s left to others to put her theories to the test.
Treatment of morning sickness with medications is risky business. One nontoxic antinausea remedy marketed to boaters and expectant mothers consists of an elastic band with a metal ball that is placed over the P-6 or Neiguan acupressure point near the wrist. Some people say it works.
Comments