Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
The evolution of color
“Dark” and “light” probably sufficed if you were living in a cave
Dear Matthew Alice: I seem to remember reading somewhere that primitive people didn’t have as many names for colors as we have today. Is that true? Why would that be? Was everything in olden times less colorful than it is today? — M. Lindstrom, San Diego
Best anthropologists can tell, necessity being the mother of invention and all, things may have been just as colorful, but primitive man never tackled a project like Horton Plaza, so there was no need for trillions of color distinctions. “Dark” and “light” probably sufficed if you were living in a cave. The abundance of color names seems to reflect the complexity of a society’s technology, say scholars who’ve studied the evolution of color names in dozens of world languages. They’ve noted that all languages have words for black and white. In languages that have three words for colors, red is invariably the third; four-color languages use black, white, red, and either yellow or green; the fifth color added is either green or yellow, whichever is missing; sixth is blue, seventh is brown, and beyond that it becomes somewhat less uniform from language to language. Has something to do with the invention of the interior decorator, I think.
Here's something you might be interested in.
The evolution of color
“Dark” and “light” probably sufficed if you were living in a cave
The evolution of color
“Dark” and “light” probably sufficed if you were living in a cave
Dear Matthew Alice: I seem to remember reading somewhere that primitive people didn’t have as many names for colors as we have today. Is that true? Why would that be? Was everything in olden times less colorful than it is today? — M. Lindstrom, San Diego
Best anthropologists can tell, necessity being the mother of invention and all, things may have been just as colorful, but primitive man never tackled a project like Horton Plaza, so there was no need for trillions of color distinctions. “Dark” and “light” probably sufficed if you were living in a cave. The abundance of color names seems to reflect the complexity of a society’s technology, say scholars who’ve studied the evolution of color names in dozens of world languages. They’ve noted that all languages have words for black and white. In languages that have three words for colors, red is invariably the third; four-color languages use black, white, red, and either yellow or green; the fifth color added is either green or yellow, whichever is missing; sixth is blue, seventh is brown, and beyond that it becomes somewhat less uniform from language to language. Has something to do with the invention of the interior decorator, I think.
Comments