Here's something you might be interested in.
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed
Big Screen — Movie commentary
Blurt — Music's inside track
Booze News — San Diego spirits
Classical Music — Immortal beauty
Classifieds — Free and easy
Cover Stories — Front-page features
Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes
Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts
Feast! — Food & drink reviews
Feature Stories — Local news & stories
Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore
From the Archives — Spotlight on the past
Golden Dreams — Talk of the town
The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it
Letters — Our inbox
Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites
Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans
Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists
Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news
News Ticker — News & politics
Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated
Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna
Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated
Poetry — The old and the new
Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers
Reading — The hunt for intellectuals
Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails
San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds
SD on the QT — Almost factual news
Sheep and Goats — Places of worship
Special Issues — The best of
Street Style — San Diego streets have style
Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves
Theater — On stage in San Diego this week
Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative
Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work
Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego
Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads
Your Week — Daily event picks
Taxicabs unlimited for San Diego
Environmental concerns alleged by permit holders don't convince the judge
The practice of selling off cabs and permits has created a virtual taxi black market in San Diego.
On Tuesday, April 28, a judge in San Diego Superior Court was not swayed by lawyers hired by the city's taxicab industry, who sought an injunction to stop Metropolitan Transit System from permitting more taxis to operate on San Diego's streets.
The city council voted 8-1 last year to lift the cap on taxi permits, currently set at just under 1000. The decision was met with outrage by current permit holders, some of whom have paid up to $160,000 to acquire the scarce permits through a legally murky gray market. Issued by MTS under a management contract with a city, the operating licenses have a face value of $3000.
In March, the San Diego Transportation Association, which represents the existing taxi owners, filed suit against MTS. Their arguments hinge on alleged violations of the California Environmental Quality Act, which could require a report studying the environmental impact of permitting an unlimited number of cabs to operate on local roads.
The association has said that as many as 5000 cabs could hit the streets if the new permits start flowing. Advocates for the change say there are closer to 1000 new applications, many from drivers who currently rent their vehicles from owners for up to $700 per week.
On Tuesday, judge Ronald Prager heard a request from association lawyers to issue an injunction that sought to block MTS from continuing to process new applications, though no permits have been issued. Prager said he was "highly skeptical" of the permit owners' intent.
"I question whether they're really motivated by environmental concerns, or if they're using this as a means to throw a wrench into the application process," Prager told lawyers representing the association, MTS, and the City of San Diego. "If someone wanted to argue this on [Environmental Quality Act] grounds, they should have done it at the city-council meeting,” which was highly attended and included hours of testimony from both sides.
The environmental issue was not raised before the city-council vote.
"I'm not sure that increasing the number of low-to-no-emission taxicabs on the road isn't going to be positive [for the environment]," Prager continued.
On Wednesday morning, April 29, Prager declined the injunction request, so the permitting process will move forward. The case, meanwhile, will continue to trial, as will a claim of "inverse condemnation," wherein the owners seek a $12 million payout over losses from the opening of the marketplace and devaluation of the inflated permit prices.
Here's something you might be interested in.
Taxicabs unlimited for San Diego
Environmental concerns alleged by permit holders don't convince the judge
Taxicabs unlimited for San Diego
Environmental concerns alleged by permit holders don't convince the judge
The practice of selling off cabs and permits has created a virtual taxi black market in San Diego.
On Tuesday, April 28, a judge in San Diego Superior Court was not swayed by lawyers hired by the city's taxicab industry, who sought an injunction to stop Metropolitan Transit System from permitting more taxis to operate on San Diego's streets.
The city council voted 8-1 last year to lift the cap on taxi permits, currently set at just under 1000. The decision was met with outrage by current permit holders, some of whom have paid up to $160,000 to acquire the scarce permits through a legally murky gray market. Issued by MTS under a management contract with a city, the operating licenses have a face value of $3000.
In March, the San Diego Transportation Association, which represents the existing taxi owners, filed suit against MTS. Their arguments hinge on alleged violations of the California Environmental Quality Act, which could require a report studying the environmental impact of permitting an unlimited number of cabs to operate on local roads.
The association has said that as many as 5000 cabs could hit the streets if the new permits start flowing. Advocates for the change say there are closer to 1000 new applications, many from drivers who currently rent their vehicles from owners for up to $700 per week.
On Tuesday, judge Ronald Prager heard a request from association lawyers to issue an injunction that sought to block MTS from continuing to process new applications, though no permits have been issued. Prager said he was "highly skeptical" of the permit owners' intent.
"I question whether they're really motivated by environmental concerns, or if they're using this as a means to throw a wrench into the application process," Prager told lawyers representing the association, MTS, and the City of San Diego. "If someone wanted to argue this on [Environmental Quality Act] grounds, they should have done it at the city-council meeting,” which was highly attended and included hours of testimony from both sides.
The environmental issue was not raised before the city-council vote.
"I'm not sure that increasing the number of low-to-no-emission taxicabs on the road isn't going to be positive [for the environment]," Prager continued.
On Wednesday morning, April 29, Prager declined the injunction request, so the permitting process will move forward. The case, meanwhile, will continue to trial, as will a claim of "inverse condemnation," wherein the owners seek a $12 million payout over losses from the opening of the marketplace and devaluation of the inflated permit prices.
Comments